Page 2 of 3

Re: Emissions logo sticker on bottom of hood? PN available?

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:41 pm
by Dave7CDMTYPER
Ime, this label is definitely mandatory for emissions in CA. I took my R to 3 or so smog places and they wouldn't do it without the sticker.

Re: Emissions logo sticker on bottom of hood? PN available?

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:27 pm
by aklackner
Worst case a ref inspection has to be able to provide a way to clear/sign off, since they'd have to do this for approved swaps.

Re: Emissions logo sticker on bottom of hood? PN available?

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:43 pm
by GeHonda
aklackner wrote: Wed Oct 16, 2019 11:32 am I'll say posting images of the label for documentation and community interest would be appreciated. All these subtle details help validate original vehicles and restoration projects hunting spares/sources for these parts or original parts containing them.

I find it interesting that there appears to have been (4) versions of the sticker, from 17277-P73-A01 to 17277-P73-A04. I would have guessed this would correspond to the ECU\emissions generation. Oddly the rough jpg shared above shows p73-A01 but part number shared was A04 if for the '98 I'd have expected A03 to match ECU and A04 for 00-01s. If "replicas" were being mixed and matched that would have led to issues additional issues outside of other reproduction issues.

In general I don't recall this sticker being mandatory for emissions testing in CA.
From what I've experienced testing\inspection mostly relies on the computer system after the vin has been input. There's too much opportunity for swapped hoods or replicas to rely on a sticker like this. If it's cops popping your hood (you're probably already getting some form of ticket anyway) and if they feel like it they'll just send you off for (ref) inspection, regardless of presence of emissions stickers, so missing it not really a requirement there either, just a potential hassle.
Regarding the A01 to A04, it is very possible that A01 = 97, A02 = 98, A03 = 00, and A04 = 01. I have no way to confirm this but it is logical.

Re: Emissions logo sticker on bottom of hood? PN available?

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2019 12:29 pm
by C0nejit09
I'm looking for both stickers as well previous owner repainted the hood and had them removed

2000 type r did u find any yet?

Re: Emissions logo sticker on bottom of hood? PN available?

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:53 am
by Mugen_ITR
On a somewhat related note, can anyone help with a PDF file of the OEM decals on the driver-side door jamb (i.e. interior/ exterior color codes plus whatever else might NOT be readily available)?

Re: Emissions logo sticker on bottom of hood? PN available?

Posted: Fri May 15, 2020 10:07 pm
by 00-1065
Stin1 wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2019 11:16 pm If I recall correctly the guy that made the decal was served a cease and desist. Copyright infringement is serious business .
I remember on the old forums someone did ALL the stickers, even the VIN ones and they were exact replicas.

Re: Emissions logo sticker on bottom of hood? PN available?

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 4:27 pm
by carpayments4life
I found a company, but their under hood emission sticker was fuzzy, for $60 each.

Re: Emissions logo sticker on bottom of hood? PN available?

Posted: Sat May 16, 2020 11:20 pm
by 00-1065
Mugen_ITR wrote: Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:53 am On a somewhat related note, can anyone help with a PDF file of the OEM decals on the driver-side door jamb (i.e. interior/ exterior color codes plus whatever else might NOT be readily available)?
I will have access to my car tomorrow and I can take pics with my iphone. I dont have a fancy camera anymore so I hope they come out decent at least.

Re: Emissions logo sticker on bottom of hood? PN available?

Posted: Thu May 21, 2020 3:52 pm
by 00-1065
This is a 2000 sticker. Car is dirty AF from storage.

Re: Emissions logo sticker on bottom of hood? PN available?

Posted: Thu May 21, 2020 6:05 pm
by Stin1
00-1065 wrote: Thu May 21, 2020 3:52 pm This is a 2000 sticker. Car is dirty AF from storage.
This looks fake to me . I am not gonna point any details out other than the bad font.