Page 5 of 37
Re: 98-1059 is here to stay
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 12:34 am
by PaulMc
What is your exhaust setup from the header back?
Re: 98-1059 is here to stay
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 12:47 pm
by Stin1
That really sucks the bumper support was missing. Why would they do that? Did they remove the charcoal canister as well? Mine was missing and the smell gave me a terrible headache. It would also stink up the garage. Keep the updates coming.
Re: 98-1059 is here to stay
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:06 pm
by Sp00nFedFilms
PaulMc wrote:What is your exhaust setup from the header back?
JDM ITR 4-1 header
JDM ITR cat (I think. It’s the shorter one)
OEM B pipe
OEM muffler
Re: 98-1059 is here to stay
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:09 pm
by Sp00nFedFilms
Stin1 wrote:That really sucks the bumper support was missing. Why would they do that? Did they remove the charcoal canister as well? Mine was missing and the smell gave me a terrible headache. It would also stink up the garage. Keep the updates coming.
Tell me about it. I’m assuming when the car was a shell without a motor it go misplaced or left behind. Yeah I’m a big fan of 100% OEM function so the charcoal canister is a must.
Re: 98-1059 is here to stay
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:48 pm
by aw614
Ah yes, that charcoal canister, never having that disconnected or deleted after I also experienced the same things as Stin1 when i unplugged it for diagnosing issues.
Re: 98-1059 is here to stay
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:15 pm
by PaulMc
Sp00nFedFilms wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:06 pm
PaulMc wrote:What is your exhaust setup from the header back?
JDM ITR 4-1 header
JDM ITR cat (I think. It’s the shorter one)
OEM B pipe
OEM muffler
That's my setup as well because unfortunately i"m unable to source a complete usdm itr set up. Though I'm using a jdm b-pipe because the usdm b pipe is too short for the jdm cat. Yours must be jdm as well for that setup or your b-pipe was modified.
Re: 98-1059 is here to stay
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:17 pm
by PaulMc
Stin1 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 12:47 pm
That really sucks the bumper support was missing. Why would they do that? Did they remove the charcoal canister as well? Mine was missing and the smell gave me a terrible headache. It would also stink up the garage. Keep the updates coming.
Was it a terrible exhaust/emissions smell? Especially when accelerating hard?
Re: 98-1059 is here to stay
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:23 pm
by aw614
PaulMc wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:17 pm
Stin1 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 12:47 pm
That really sucks the bumper support was missing. Why would they do that? Did they remove the charcoal canister as well? Mine was missing and the smell gave me a terrible headache. It would also stink up the garage. Keep the updates coming.
Was it a terrible exhaust/emissions smell? Especially when accelerating hard?
I've heard the about smell was worse on the obd1 cars after hard acceleration, but in my case I recall it just smelled like gas, but made me nauseous even just sitting at a traffic light at idle
Re: 98-1059 is here to stay
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:32 pm
by Stin1
PaulMc wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:17 pm
Stin1 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 12:47 pm
That really sucks the bumper support was missing. Why would they do that? Did they remove the charcoal canister as well? Mine was missing and the smell gave me a terrible headache. It would also stink up the garage. Keep the updates coming.
Was it a terrible exhaust/emissions smell? Especially when accelerating hard?
I would compare it to a heavy unburned emissions smell combined with a BBQ with lighter fluid stinch if that makes sense? The smell makes me understand why it's called a charcoal canister.
Re: 98-1059 is here to stay
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:40 pm
by Dave7CDMTYPER
Sp00nFedFilms wrote: ↑Mon Jun 17, 2019 10:06 pm
PaulMc wrote:What is your exhaust setup from the header back?
JDM ITR 4-1 header
JDM ITR cat (I think. It’s the shorter one)
OEM B pipe
OEM muffler
I'm always curious about the different ways people deal with the secondary O2 sensor (when using jdm cat). What's your setup with that?