Page 2 of 3

Re: Bat 98

Posted: Sat May 12, 2018 1:17 pm
by g3teg97
Interesting, thank you for the explanation.

Re: Bat 98

Posted: Sat May 12, 2018 7:17 pm
by Dave7CDMTYPER
17.5 seems kind of high to me considering the engine was rebuilt.

Re: Bat 98

Posted: Sun May 13, 2018 10:43 pm
by RTW DC2R
Havent looked at the BaT ad yet but this is what I have in my archive. This car was K swapped at one point.

http://forums.itrexpo.com/zerothread?id=18295 (post no longer working)
VIN: JH4DC2314WS003357
Badge: 98-0650

My Photo Archive (sorry is in Photobucket)
http://s303.photobucket.com/user/rtwdc2 ... 0%20Kansas

Re: Bat 98

Posted: Mon May 14, 2018 7:07 am
by g3teg97
The plot thickens haha.

Re: Bat 98

Posted: Mon May 14, 2018 12:22 pm
by 604ITR
Dave7CDMTYPER wrote: Sat May 12, 2018 7:17 pm 17.5 seems kind of high to me considering the engine was rebuilt.
I dont think a properly rebuilt engine hurts a vehicles sale price. However going to a k20 and then a jdm engine i would say it does.

Re: Bat 98

Posted: Mon May 14, 2018 3:56 pm
by Dave7CDMTYPER
604ITR wrote: Mon May 14, 2018 12:22 pm
Dave7CDMTYPER wrote: Sat May 12, 2018 7:17 pm 17.5 seems kind of high to me considering the engine was rebuilt.
I dont think a properly rebuilt engine hurts a vehicles sale price. However going to a k20 and then a jdm engine i would say it does.
Yea that's what I meant basically. It's still nice, but it's not a unicorn anymore. But I'd still think that a rebuilt oem engine would reduce the sale price somewhat. But as time goes along this effect might become less relevant.

Re: Bat 98

Posted: Mon May 14, 2018 4:10 pm
by 604ITR
agreed i am however shocked at the price it finally sold for

Re: Bat 98

Posted: Mon May 14, 2018 6:58 pm
by touringteg
It did pretty well considering it's history.

The reasonable mileage and the fact it has been brought closer to stock helped a lot.

Chasing down used stock parts is getting more challenging every year.

Re: Bat 98

Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 9:20 am
by g3teg97

touringteg wrote:It did pretty well considering it's history.
I dunno...that jump to 17,500 from 2,500 seems fishy to me.

Re: Bat 98

Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 12:13 pm
by white rocket
We will know if the buyer honors the purchase agreement? The first price jump was insanity yet it still climbed slightly in the end. It does seem a bit fishy to me. Also surprised that a car that has been through the ringer in terms of engine failure and swaps, tracked, etc yet when put back to near stock form it still commands a tall price.